A Secret Trip to Saudi Arabia, and a Major Charity Bust
So, what was the secret trip that Juan Zarate of Treasury and NSC honcho Fran Townsend took to Saudi Arabia last month, apparently with a strongly-worded letter forcefully requesting that the royal family take action against the powerful al Rajhi Banking and Investment Corp.? The news was first reported in a tiny squib in the Wall Street Journal, but no one else seems to have picked up on it. Apparently, the high-level delegation threatened to put the al Rajhi company on the dirty bank list reserved for those who launder money and aid organized crime, as well as terrorists, unless it cleaned up its banking practices. Al Rajhi is suing the Journal and has threatened law suits against other publications who have pointed out that the wealthy and powerful family has ties to the Safa Network in Northern Virginia under investigation for terrorist financing, and was on the "Golden Chain" list of major donors to al Qaeda discovered in Bosnia. No one wants to talk about the visit now, or what the Saudis said in response. A bank spokesman told the Journal that he "is not aware o fany investigation by U.S. or Saudi authorities." To hear U.S. officials talk, neither are they.
In another strange twist, Treasury Secretary Snow actually GAVE BACK $25 million that the House had appropriated for FinCEN, the small unit that is supposed to be actively engaged in policing terror financing. Rep. Sue Kelly (R-NY) and others had pushed for the money to help FinCEN upgrade computers, hire more analysts and generally be more effective in its work. But a nasty fight broke out among Republicans over the money, and Snow ended up giving it back, saying in a letter that current funding levels for FinCEN "are appropriate." For a group that is supposed to be getting serious about these issues, it is truely one of the oddest decisions in recent memory. Since the loss of Green Quest, Treasury has no enforcement arm. FinCEN is the closest thing it has to an investigative unit, but it is understaffed and geared toward looking at the traditional financial crimes of drug money laundering and bank fraud. Like much of the rest of government, it is sorely lacking in basic technology. The $25 million could have been spent on that alone. Meanwhile, despite the millions it NEVER offers to return, the FBI remains, basically, stuck in the 1980s in terms of technology. How this is possible, three years after 9-11, is truely a mystery. Yet offices here in Washington, D.C. still rely on a single dial-up modem for accessing the internet. DSL is still in the distant future. So they can't monitor the web, they can't communicate with each other, and have to take turns on a modem that was outdated several years ago.
Finally, Treasury desingated the Islamic Africa Relief Agency (IARA), along with five senior officials, as terrorist financiers, alleging direct support for al Qaeda, Hamas and other organizations. IARA is particularly interesting because it operates out of Sudan, and was closely affiliated with Maktab al-Khidamat (MK), the forerunner of al Qaeda. The group has been active in Senegal and elsewhere in West Africa as part of a network of Islamic NGOs and charities that have helped spread a militant brand of Islam in a region where that religion has traditionally been extremely tolerant. And where al Qaeda bought diamonds. The full text of the Treasury statement can be found here.
Like most of the designated Islamic charities, this one established it U.S. base in quiet. out of the way Columbia, Missouri. And like most of the others, it had drawn the attention, but not the action, of federal authorities for years. In this case, since 1999. U.S. federal agents, led by the FBI, moved in yesterday and carted off hard drives, documents and anything else they could get their hands on. One can only hope that, unlike the Northern Virginia Safa case, where translation has been horrendously slow and bureaucratic infighting has made the case a difficult one to advance, this one runs more smoothly.
2 Comments:
Doug,
It's pretty clear to me that whatever is going on in this country it's clearly not a "war on terror". This post of yours today demonstrates this pretty clearly. How can we justify spending billions invading a country that had nothing to do with 9-11, yet refuse to go after the financiers of Al-Qaeda. Kerry should be making a big issue of this in the campaign. I did notice he mentioned "terrorist financing" once in the first debate. Other than that, I haven't heard much. Perhaps because he has advisers like Robert Rubin, who pretty much has the same view as Snow from what I gather.
Doug,
I found a cryptic comment by the DEA in this story on ABCNews.com of the cocaine-running Saudi prince to be interesting:
N E W Y O R K, Oct. 15, 2004 -- A Saudi prince moved roughly two tons of cocaine from Colombia to an airport outside Paris, using his diplomatic status and a royal family 727 jet, U.S. and French law enforcement authorities told ABC News.
"It doesn't happen without him," said Tom Raffanello of the Drug Enforcement Agency in Miami. "He is the key co-conspirator. He's the straw that stirs the drink, he made it happen. No plane, no dope. Dope stays in Colombia." Prince Nayef bin Fawwaz Al Shalaan is under indictment by U.S. and French authorities, but living outside the reach of American law in Saudi Arabia, according to Raffanello. The United States and Saudi Arabia have no extradition treaty. A trial for the prince's alleged co-conspirators is scheduled to begin next month in a federal court in Miami.
"He's a fugitive in the United States. He's a fugitive in violation of federal narcotics law," Raffanello said. Prince Nayef bin Fawwaz Al Shalaan claimed in an Arab newspaper that he was cleared of any wrongdoing by the Saudi government, stating he was seeking investors in a deal for plastic pipe, not smuggling cocaine. "That's an alibi, he moved dope," said Rafanello.
The DEA speculated that terrorism was a possible motive, but there is no formal terrorism charge in the indictment.
"Later on in the investigation, we came to find out that he would use some or all of the profit to fund terrorism, through whatever indices he was using to do it," Raffanello said.
Post a Comment
<< Home