A veteran investigative reporter exposes the crucial piece of the terrorism puzzle
Western intelligence missed: the subterranean financial network that stretches
from the diamond fields of West Africa and commodities markets in Europe and the
Middle East to terrorist-front charities based in U.S. cities-and that remains
intact and ready to support al Qaeda's next plot...
BLOOD FROM STONES
The Secret Financial Network of Terror
Douglas Farah
"Farah's drum-tight presentation of evidence to substantiate his allegations will
be difficult to dispute, and his stark and straightforward writing style makes
this book hard to put down."
- Publishers Weekly (starred review)
"Farah's swiftly moving narrative introduces a cast of characters worthy of a Le
Carré novel, ranging from tough-talking CIA agents to canny African operators to
the super-villainous former Soviet officer responsible for arming both sides in
the Afghan civil war. . . Immensely valuable for those who follow the movements of
international terrorists-who, by Farah's account, walk among us on all sides."
- Kirkus Reviews
Why has the money trail around al Qaeda grown so cold? And how is it that,
despite President George W. Bush's vow to "choke off the flow of terrorist money"
in the wake of 9/11, terror groups are clearly still able to fund their operations
worldwide, as evidenced by the Bali bombing in October 2002, the May 2003 suicide
attacks in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and the March 2004 train bombings in Madrid that
left 199 people dead and more than 1,800 others injured?
As revealed in BLOOD FROM STONES: The Secret Financial Network of Terror (Broadway
Books; May 4, 2004; Hardcover; $24.95) by veteran investigative reporter Douglas
Farah, the alarming answer to these questions is that al Qaeda and other terrorist
organizations such as Hezbollah have long followed a financial diversification
strategy that has rendered the crackdown by U.S. and other governments almost
useless. The effectiveness of this strategy has been aided by diverse factors: the
rapid deregulation that came with financial globalization, which has enabled
instantaneous financial transfers that are hard to trace; bitter in-fighting,
disorganization, and lack of central control among U.S. intelligence agencies
which continue to hamper our efforts to combat terrorism; and specific
intelligence failures by the CIA which, on at least two occasions, missed the
connection between al Qaeda and the West African diamond trade.
Discovery of the al Qaeda Diamond Trail
Farah first stumbled upon the connection between al Qaeda and the illicit African
diamond trade a few weeks after the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York City
and Washington DC, while serving as the West Africa Bureau Chief for the
Washington Post. Over lunch in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, Cindor Reeves, a veteran of
West Africa's murderous underworld of diamond trading and black-market arms deals,
described to Farah a safe house he had rented in the Liberian capital of Monrovia
on behalf of a group of Arab diamond dealers protected by then-Liberian president
Charles Taylor. These Arabs, he reported, were furiously buying millions of
dollars of diamonds at above-market prices from rebels in neighboring Sierra
Leone. They had also put pictures of bin Laden on their walls and spent much of
their free time watching videos of Palestinian suicide bombings.
"That conversation ultimately launched me on a journey across four continents that
would give me a unique window into the uncharted world of terrorist financing,"
writes Farah, whose book uncovers for the first time the interlocking web of
commodities, underground transfer systems, charities, and sympathetic bankers that
support terrorist activities around the world. Sharing information he obtained far
ahead of what U.S. intelligence agencies knew as they scrambled to understand al
Qaeda's money in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, Farah takes readers inside a
shadowy world that stretches from the killing fields of Sierra Leone, where, in
exchange for diamonds, terrorists paid cash to some of the most brutal killers in
Africa, to the gold markets of the United Arab Emirates and the secretive diamond
trading center in Antwerp, Belgium, and from money merchants in Pakistan to the
suburbs of Washington DC, Detroit, Chicago, and Dallas where radical Islamic
charity organizations adept at raising funds serve as a sophisticated financial
front for terrorist organizations, siphoning off millions of dollars to fund
violence and terror.
How al Qaeda Built a Global Financial Network Resistant to Western Retaliation
In 1999, in the aftermath of the August 1998 attacks on the U.S. embassies in
Kenya and Tanzania, the Clinton Administration froze $240 million belonging to al
Qaeda and the Taliban in Western banks-most of it in the form of gold reserves on
deposit with the U.S. Federal Reserve. Realizing their vulnerability, al Qaeda's
leaders subsequently moved tens of millions of dollars from banks into diamonds,
gold, tanzanite, emeralds, and sapphires, commodities that are easy to transport,
smuggle, and convert yet difficult to track. With diamonds and other commodities
in hand, al Qaeda operatives turned towards home grown money merchants in
countries such as Saudi Arabia, Dubai, and Pakistan, relying on a network of
sympathetic and enterprising network of gold merchants, gemstone buyers, and
hawala-a traditional Arab and Asian trust-based system of moving funds through
brokers-to convert commodities into cash and cash into commodities such as
weapons, ammunition, satellite telephones, or gold. Observes Farah, "U.S. and
European intelligence missed this shift completely."
Al Qaeda's Africa Connection
As detailed in BLOOD FROM STONES, al Qaeda's foray into the world of West African
diamond trading was not the first by a terrorist group. For years, Lebanon's
Hezbollah used diamond riches to fund its causes; by the early 1980s, all factions
in Lebanon's civil war derived substantial funding from the Sierra Leone diamond
trade. Al Qaeda itself had been active in the 1990s in both East and West Africa,
and evidence from the trial of Wadih el Hage, who had worked for several years as
bin Laden's personal secretary and who was convicted for plotting the U.S. embassy
bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, showed that al Qaeda's interest in diamonds
stretched back several years. This evidence has, however, been largely overlooked
by intelligence officials and investigators.
Al Qaeda's entrée into the West African diamond trade in the late 1990s was
provided through Ibrahim Bah, a Libyan-trained Senegalese who had fought with the
mujahadeen in Afghanistan and whom Charles Taylor had entrusted to handle the
majority of his diamond deals. Bah arranged for al Qaeda operatives to buy all
diamonds possible from the RUF, the Charles Taylor-supported rebel army that
controlled much of neighboring civil-war-torn Sierra Leone. "The rebels used the
cash from al Qaeda to buy the weapons. The stones gave al Qaeda a fail-safe way to
hide its assets outside banks and other financial institutions," writes Farah.
"Belgian investigators later traced $20 million through a single account they
believe was used by al Qaeda to purchase diamonds."
In June 2001, during a visit to the rebel-controlled "blood diamond" fields in
Sierra Leone, Farah observed first-hand a frenzy of activity spurred by the recent
arrival of strangers offering exorbitant prices for the better-quality stones. No
one knew who these buyers were, he reports. "They just dubbed the new patrons 'bad
Lebanese,' believing them to be part of the Lebanese diamond-buying network that
had controlled diamond sales in the country for decades."
It was only months after the tragic events of 9/11 that Farah would discover the
true identity of the mysterious buyers who had cornered the West African diamond
market. When he showed Cindor Reeves, his Liberian source, a two-page spread of
mug shots of the FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists in Newsweek magazine, Reeves quickly
identified Khalfan Ghaliani, Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, and Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah,
described by the FBI as a "top bin Laden advisor," as the men who had rented the
safe house in Liberia and whom he had taken to the diamond fields. Farah
subsequently confirmed Reeves' identifications at a tense face-to-face meeting
with the commanders of the RUF from whom the al Qaeda operatives had purchased
diamonds. "The buyers, the 'bad Lebanese,' were in fact senior operatives of Osama
bin Laden's al Qaeda network," he writes. "The purchase of millions of dollars of
diamonds was a desperate race against time to convert terrorist cash into a
commodity that could survive U.S. retaliation. The tactic went undetected until it
was too late."
The CIA Drops the Ball, Then Covers Its Tracks
Farah's story revealing the al Qaeda connection to illicit diamond trading as well
as the complicity of Ibrahim Bah and Charles Taylor ran on the front page of The
Washington Post on November 2, 2001, and was picked up by wire services and radio
reports around the world. Days later, Farah was informed by the U.S. government
that there were "credible threats" of "retribution" against him for the story and
he was forced to evacuate from Africa with his family.
In response to Farah's story, the U.S. government said it had no information about
any al Qaeda ties to diamonds in West Africa. However, the CIA requested that
Farah brief a group of its analysts about how he had obtained his story. At an
initial meeting at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, in late November 2001,
the analysts Farah met with were dismissive of his story. "It was clear from the
questions that some of the agents were concerned I was going to write that there
had been a massive intelligence failure in their not detecting the diamond trail,"
he writes. As it turned out, the CIA was worried about more than that. "What I
didn't know when I first met with the CIA," states Farah, "was that they had, in
fact, already blown several opportunities to dig into the diamond story. There
were indeed footprints to try to cover."
Nothing the intelligence community could have known would have changed 9/11. But
following the evidence would have made it much easier to trace illegal funds. The
first time the CIA had ignored compelling information that would have shed light
on the diamond trade between Liberia's Charles Taylor and those close to al Qaeda
took place in February 2001. Hoping that the U.S. government would agree to
forgive an outstanding warrant against him for check fraud in exchange for
information about diamonds-for-weapons deals he had witnessed, Allie Derwish, a
Lebanese-American diamond dealer who had initiated the diamond deals that
eventually led to al Qaeda, contacted the U.S. embassy in Belgium. After waiting
several days for a response, Derwish finally won a meeting with a political
officer from the U.S. embassy to whom he described the safe house in Liberia,
diamonds for weapons deals and the roles of key players including Ibrahim Bah,
whose satellite phone number he provided. While Derwish's information created a
stir within the National Security Council in Washington, the U.S. Justice
department balked at making a formal deal with him and the CIA said it had no
interest in his information. Derwish was told to stop calling the U.S. embassy.
The CIA missed a second opportunity in the days immediately preceding the 9/11 al
Qaeda strike against the U.S., when Cindor Reeves called the U.S. embassy in
Sierra Leone to warn of an impending attack against American interests. At a
meeting with a political officer from the U.S. embassy on September 10, Reeves
recounted how he had been with Ibrahim Bah a few days previously when Bah received
a phone call from an Arabic speaker. Hanging up the phone, Bah told Reeves to wait
and see what would happen to the United States, which thought it was the world's
policeman, in the next few days. "The U.S.," asserts Farah, "won't comment on that
meeting."
Although the details of Farah's reporting have been corroborated by European
intelligence agencies, nonprofit organizations such as Global Witness, and the
UN-backed Special Court that has indicted Charles Taylor for crimes against
humanity and issued a warrant for his arrest, the CIA continued, as recently as
February 2003, to maintain that there was no evidence of an al Qaeda tie to the
diamond trade. At the same time, as Farah details in BLOOD FROM STONES, to protect
itself against Congressional outrage about its failures, the CIA actively sought
to discredit journalists such as Farah as well as their sources. Farah made Cindor
Reeves available to the CIA for questioning (a move he deeply regrets). But the
intelligence officials deliberately set Reeves up to fail a polygraph exam, in
order to say Farah's main source was not trustworthy. They later alleged Reeves
failed every single question, questions that centered on why he had lied to Farah
about the al Qaeda connection. They also paid Ibrahim Bah for information and
tried to recruit him as a permanent CIA asset. "All of a sudden, it dawned on me
what the CIA had done," writes Farah. "but I still couldn't believe it. After
discreet inquiries, a senior U.S. official with access to the intelligence
confirmed my suspicions. The whole meeting with CR, he said, was 'a set up. It was
meant to show your source as being unreliable for two reasons: to be able to
discredit him if his meetings with embassy personnel ever became public; and to
clear the way for dealing with Bah, who can now be portrayed as reputable.'"
U.S. Counterterrorism Policy in Deep Disarray -
How Bureaucratic Squabbles and Lack of Central Control Have Hampered Our Ability
to Cut Off the Flow of Terror Money
As described in BLOOD FROM STONES, the failure of the CIA to recognize and respond
effectively to the connection between al Qaeda and the West African diamond trade,
while troubling in itself, is symptomatic of a broader inability of the U.S.
government to effectively go after al Qaeda's elaborate financial structure as
well as of a counterterrorism policy in deep disarray.
Throughout the Bush administration, charges Farah, "government rhetoric about the
war on terror has masked a lack of sustained interest in fighting the threat on
the ground." The Clinton administration had begun to take seriously the threat of
al Qaeda and international terrorism, but terrorism was not a priority for the
Bush administration when it came into power; and, after 9/11, the war on Iraq
diverted crucial resources and manpower from the overall counterterrorism
strategy. The problems with the current system have been exacerbated by the sheer
volume of "threat information" that senior officials must sift through, as well as
by rapid turnover of senior level officials at the State Department, Pentagon, and
other agencies, as exemplified by the successive resignations-in a short period of
time-of Dick Clarke, General Wayne Downing, and Rand Beers as the top White House
counterterrorism advisor. This turnover, maintains Farah, "has taken a toll on
counterterrorism efforts. Decades of experience and knowledge have been lost at
the time when they are most needed. Some of those who left blamed their
dissatisfaction, in conversations with friends and colleagues, on the insular
nature of Bush's inner circle, the inability to present unbiased intelligence, and
the increasingly dysfunctional intelligence process itself."
"The efforts to cut off the flow of money to terrorists have not been exempt from
the dysfunctionality," writes Farah, who describes how in-fighting and lack of
cooperation and coordination among U.S., agencies- including between the FBI,
Customs, and the Treasury, and between the FBI and the CIA-has long undermined
America's ability to mount a coherent response to the terrorist threat. "For
twenty months after 9/11, efforts to track and freeze terrorist funds were
hampered by a bitter and bureaucratic turf battle over which government agency
would be responsible for investigating terrorist financing," he observes, pointing
out that it was only in May 2003 that a Memo of Understanding between Attorney
General Ashcroft and Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge finally gave the FBI
sole control over terrorist-related financial investigations. While cooperation
among government agencies has since improved, more than two years after 9/11 the
United States remains far behind in the race to cut off the flow of money, the
lifeblood of terrorism.
A riveting-and deeply unsettling-work of investigative journalism that shows not
only how terrorists are able to orchestrate complex and expensive attacks but also
why our ongoing and future wars on terrorism will be so difficult to win, BLOOD
FROM STONES is the first book to tell the crucial, untold story of one of the
least understood, but most pivotal, battlefields in that war.
BLOOD FROM STONES
The Secret Financial Network of Terror
By Douglas Farah
Published by Broadway Books
Publication Date: May 4, 2004
Hardcover; $24.95; 240 pages
ISBN # : 0-7679-1562-3
About the Author
Douglas Farah has been an award-winning member of the investigative staff and a
foreign correspondent for The Washington Post and other publications. In March
2000, the Post named him West Africa bureau chief. He was stationed in Abidjan,
Ivory Coast, until threats on his life forced him and his family to evacuate.
Since January 2004, he has worked as a consultant and senior fellow at the
National Strategy Information Center, writing on national intelligence matters.
He lives in Washington, D.C., area with his wife and three children.
To schedule an interview with Doug Farah, please contact David Drake at Broadway
Books at 212-782-9001 or ddrake@randomhouse.com
|